Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 69
State of Louisiana v. Garland
as 24-30359
Plaintiff: State of Louisiana, State of Missouri, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Mary Cheng, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
KY, et al v. FHWA, et al
as 24-5532
Plaintiff: COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant: FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, SHAILEN BHATT, in his official capacity at Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and others
State of Tennessee et al v. Becerra et al
as 1:2024cv00161
Plaintiff: State of Tennessee, State of Mississippi, State of Alabama and others
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Melanie Fontes Rainer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
State of Tennessee et al v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff: State of Tennessee, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Charlotte A. Burrows, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Louisiana et al v. Biden et al
as 2:2024cv00406
Plaintiff: State of Louisiana, State of Texas, State of Mississippi and others
Defendant: Joseph R Biden, Jr, U S Dept of Energy, Jennifer Granholm and others
Amicus Curiae: Center for L N G and American Petroleum Institute
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas v. DHS
as 24-40160
Plaintiff: State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Defendant / Appellee: Valerie Laveus, Francis Arauz, Paul Zito and others
State of Tennessee v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 24-5220
Plaintiff: STATE OF TENNESSEE
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, JESSICA S. MARCELLA, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Commonwealth of Kentucky et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of South Dakota, State of Alabama and others
Defendant: Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt, U.S. Department of Transportation and others
Interested Party: The American Road and Transportation Builders Association and The Associated General Contractors of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Louisiana et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01714
Plaintiff: State of Louisiana, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: U S Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan
Intervenor Plaintiff: State of California, California Water Resources Control Board, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas v. USA
as 23-40653
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy Miller, Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: Maria Rocha, Jose Magana-Salgado, Nanci J. Palacios Godinez and others
Intervenor: State of New Jersey

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?