Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Joe Taylor, et al v. City of Gadsden, et al
as 13-13885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE TAYLOR, JEFF MAYBEN, LECIL HARRELSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF GADSDEN, AL, an Alabama Municipal corporation and SHERMAN GUYTON, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Gadsden
Pena et al v. Taylor Farms Pacific, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01282
Plaintiff:
Maria del Carmen Pena , Consuelo Hernandez , Leticia Suarez and others
Defendant:
Taylor Farms Pacific, Inc. , Abel Mendoza, Inc., Manpower, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Community Health Care Associat v. New York State Department of
as 13-991
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Community Health Care Association of New York, Anthony L. Jordan Health Center, Bedford Stuyvesant Family Health Center, Inc. and others
Defendant:
State of New York, New York State Department of Health and Does 1-20
Defendant - Appellant:
M.D. Richard F. Daines, in his official capacity as Commissioner and M.D. Nirav R. Shah, in his official capacity as Commissioner
Community Health Care Associat v. New York State Department of H
as 13-771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Community Health Care Association of New York, Anthony L. Jordan Health Center, Bedford Stuyvesant Family Health Center, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Does 1-20
Defendant - Appellee:
M.D. Richard F. Daines, in his official capacity as Commissioner, New York State Department of Health and State of New York
N.A. of Tobacco Outlets, Inc., et al v. Providence, RI, et al
as 13-1053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TOBACCO OUTLETS, INC., CIGAR ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PROVIDENCE, RI, PROVIDENCE BOARD OF LICENSES, PROVIDENCE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Interested Party:
RI DEPARTMENT OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, AND HOSPITALS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, - RI Chapters and TOBACCO CONTROL LEGAL CONSORTIUM
New York Association of Convenience Stores et al v. Village of Haverstraw, New York et al
as 1:2012cv05013
Plaintiff:
New York Association of Convenience Stores , Lorillard Tobacco Company , R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and others
Defendant:
Village of Haverstraw, New York, Village of Haverstraw Building Department, Haverstraw Town Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331
New York Association of Convenience Stores et al v. Village of Haverstraw, New York et al
as 7:2012cv05013
Plaintiff:
New York Association of Convenience Stores , Lorillard Tobacco Company , R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and others
Defendant:
Village of Haverstraw, New York, Village of Haverstraw Building Department, Haverstraw Town Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331
METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON CHAPTER, ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv00853
Plaintiff:
METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON CHAPTER, ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC. , MILLER & LONG CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC. , HAWKINS ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION OF DC, LLC and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and VINCENT C. GRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Association New Jersey Rifle a, et al v. Governor of the State of New J, et al
as 12-1624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASSOCIATION NEW JERSEY RIFLE AND PISTOL CLUBS, a New Jersey Not for Profit Corporation, SCOTT L. BACH, KAARE A. JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY, COLONEL RICK FUENTES, Superintendent, Division of New Jersey State Police and others
National Association of Tobacco Outlets, Inc. et al v. City of Providence, Rhode Island et al
as 1:2012cv00096
Plaintiff:
National Association of Tobacco Outlets, Inc. , Cigar Association of America, Inc. , Lorillard Tobacco Company and others
Defendant:
City of Providence, Rhode Island , Providence Board of Licenses , Providence Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
