Cases 1 - 10 of 632
Doe (RJC) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RJC)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pioneers Memorial Healthcare District v. Imperial Valley Healthcare District et al
as 3:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
Pioneers Memorial Healthcare District
Defendant:
Robert Amparano
Respondent:
Imperial Valley Healthcare District, Enola Berker, Katherine Burnworth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ss Fed. Question: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cynthia Brown, et al v. David Yost
as 24-3354
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA BROWN, CARLOS BUFORD and JENNY SUE ROWE
Defendant:
DAVID YOST, In his Official Capacity as Ohio Attorney General
John Doe (RWC) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RWC)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Yan v. Taylor
as 24-10288
Plaintiff:
Conghua Yan
Defendant:
Mark A. Taylor, in his official capacity as Criminal District Office Investigator, Tarrant County, and in his private capacity, Richard B. Harwell, in his official capacity as Sergeant, Tarrant County, and in his private capacity and David F. Bennett, in his official capacity as Sheriff, Deputy, Tarrant County, and in his private capacity
Doe (WDM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
John Doe (WDM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (ELA) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (ELA), John Doe #2 (BMA), John Doe #3 (RNB) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown et al v. Yost
as 2:2024cv01401
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Brown, Carlos Buford and Jenny Sue Rowe
Defendant:
David Yost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Kaywood v. Kilgore et al
as 2:2024cv00931
Plaintiff:
Kurt Kaywood
Defendant:
David Kilgore, Jennifer Carrow and Dennis Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. ME Comm'n on Gov't Ethics and Election Practices, et al
as 24-1265
Plaintiff:
VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J. SCHNEIDER, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, DAVID R. HASTINGS, III, in his official capacity as a Member of the Maine Governmental Ethics and Election Practices and others
Interested Party:
PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS, FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
