Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Green Room LLC, et al v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 24-8053
Defendant: WYOMING GOVERNOR, AKA Mark Gordon, BIG HORN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, in her official capacity, AKA Marcia Bean, GOSHEN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, in his official capacity, AKA Eric Boyer and others
Plaintiff: CIND'S CBD AND VAPE LLC, PLATTE ENTERPRISES LLC, DBA Platte Hemp Company LLC, MINDY FLINT and others
UNITED FACULTY OF FLORIDA et al v. LAMB et al
as 1:2024cv00136
Defendant: Ashley Bell Barnett, MAXIMO ALVAREZ, EDWARD HADDOCK and others
Plaintiff: UNITED FACULTY OF FLORIDA, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA CHAPTER OF THE UNITED FACULTY OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY CHAPTER OF THE UNITED FACULTY OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Redeaux et al v. Wise et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv01979
Plaintiff: Mary Ann Redeaux, Andrea Smith and Pamela Jones
Defendant: Noel Wise, Rebekah Evenson, Sarah Standard-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Central Maine Power Company, et al v. ME Comm'n on Gov't Ethics and Election Practices, et al
as 24-1265
Plaintiff: VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant: MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J. SCHNEIDER, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, DAVID R. HASTINGS, III, in his official capacity as a Member of the Maine Governmental Ethics and Election Practices and others
Interested Party: PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS, FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Higgins et al v. Glenn et al
as 6:2024cv00205
Plaintiff: Sarah Higgins, Ernestine Olds, Ahtajday Phillips and others
Defendant: Bobby A Glenn, Edward J Washington, Terrance J Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Vermont Federation of Sportsmen's Clubs et al v. Birmingham et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00710
Plaintiff: Vermont Federation of Sportsmen's Clubs, Powderhorn Outdoor Sports Center, Inc., JPC, Inc. doing business as Black Dog Shooting Supplies and others
Defendant: Matthew Birmingham, Charity Clark and Sarah George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PRINGLE et al v. FREY et al
as 1:2023cv00453
Plaintiff: JANE P PRINGLE, KENNETH FLETCHER, BONNIE S GOULD and others
Defendant: AARON FREY, MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER and others
Amicus Curiae: PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VERSANT POWER et al v. SCHNEIDER et al
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff: VERSANT POWER and ENMAX CORPORATION
Defendant: WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER, DAVID R HASTINGS, III, SARAH E LECLAIRE and others
Petitioner: PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY v. MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00450
Plaintiff: CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANY
Defendant: MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, WILLIAM J SCHNEIDER, DAVID R HASTINGS, III and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: VERSANT POWER, ENMAX CORPORATION, MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae: PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Petitioner: FREE SPEECH FOR PEOPLE and REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION et al v. MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES et al
as 1:2023cv00452
Plaintiff: MAINE PRESS ASSOCIATION and MAINE ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS
Defendant: MAINE COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS AND ELECTION PRACTICES, DAVID R HASTINGS, III, SARAH E LECLAIRE and others
Amicus Curiae: PROTECT MAINE ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?