Cases 91 - 100 of 148
International Equity Investmen v. Opportunity Equity Partners Lt
as 10-1922
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Citigroup Venture Capital International Brazil, LLC, On behalf of itself and Citigroup Venture Capital Int'l. Brazil, L.P. (f.k.a CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners, L.P.), Citigroup Venture Capital International Brazil, L.P. and International Equity Investments, Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Opportunity Equity Partners Ltd., formerly known as CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners Ltd.
Defendant - Appellee:
Daniel Valente Dantas, Banco Opportunity S.A., Dorio Ferman and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
Luis Roberto Demarco Almeida
Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. et al v. The Republic of Argentina
as 1:2010cv03507
Petitioner:
Citigroup Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Receiver:
Bart M. Schwartz
3Rd Party Defendant:
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A., BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc. and BBVA Securities, Inc.
Interested Party:
Depository Trust Company, Banco De La Nacion Argentina, Cede & Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. and Aurelius Opportunities Fund II, LLC
Defendant:
The Republic of Argentina
Amicus Curiae:
Duane Morris Individual Plaintiffs and The Clearing House Association L.L.C.
Special Master:
Daniel A. Pollack
Garnishee:
BASF Corporation
Respondent:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bc
Texas PGI, Inc et al v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc et al
as 1:2010cv03053
Plaintiff:
Texas PGI, Inc and Paragon Reserve Company
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc and Citigroup Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Texas PGI, Inc et al v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00489
Plaintiff:
Texas PGI, Inc and Paragon Reserve Company
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc and Citigroup Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Aurelius Opportunities Fund II, LLC et al v. The Republic of Argentina
as 1:2010cv01602
Petitioner:
Citigroup Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC, Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and others
Receiver:
Bart M. Schwartz
3Rd Party Defendant:
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A., BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc. and BBVA Securities, Inc.
Interested Party:
Depository Trust Company, Banco de la Nacion Argentina, Cede & Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. and Aurelius Opportunities Fund II, LLC
Defendant:
The Republic of Argentina
Amicus Curiae:
Duane Morris Individual Plaintiffs and The Clearing House Association L.L.C.
Special Master:
Daniel A. Pollack
Garnishee:
BASF Corporation
Respondent:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bc
Winkler v. Citigroup Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00572
Plaintiff:
Mark Winkler and Mark Winkler
Defendant:
Citigroup Inc., Citigroup Inc., Citimortgage, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Sungate Securities LLLP v. Citigroup Inc.
as 6:2010cv00255
Plaintiff:
Sungate Securities LLLP, Sungate Securities LLLP and Sungate Securities LLLP
Defendant:
Citigroup Inc. and Citigroup Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Peckler, et al v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., et al
as 10-1124
Plaintiff:
MAXWELL PECKLER, GARY H. COHEN, JAMES B. PINDER and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME RENAUDIN and STEVEN RODEMER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS, INC., SMITH BARNEY INC., CITIFINANCIAL, INC. and others
Patricia Handley v. Citigroup Inc, et al
as 10-1281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA HANDLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIGROUP INC, DBA Citicards, AKA Citibank SD and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK USA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AKA Chase Bank SA, AKA Bank One Corp
Fulcrum Credit Partners LLC v. ChipMOS Technologies Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00060
Defendant:
ChipMOS Technologies Inc., ChipMOS U.S.A. and Citigroup Inc.
Plaintiff:
Fulcrum Credit Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
