Cases 11 - 20 of 27
United States of America for the use and beneift of L&W Supply Corporation v. Exterior Walls, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00220
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of L&W Supply Corporation
Defendant:
Exterior Walls, Inc., Archer Western Contractors, Ltd., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Harris Ventures, Inc. v. Archer Western Contractors, Ltd. et al
as 4:2011cv00185
Plaintiff:
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Harris Ventures, Inc.
Defendant:
Archer Western Contractors, Ltd., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, . and Mid-Continent Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
United States of America, for the use and benefit of C.Q. Insulation, Inc. v. Archer Western Contractors, Ltd. et al
as 4:2011cv00156
Plaintiff:
United States of America, for the use and benefit of C.Q. Insulation, Inc.
Defendant:
Archer Western Contractors, Ltd. , Travelers Casualty And Surety Company Of America , Exterior Walls, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Travelers Casualty And Surety Company Of America and Archer Western Contractors, Ltd.
Cross_defendant:
Exterior Walls, Inc. and North American Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
The United States of America, for the use of Floor Crete Enterprises, Inc. v. Salamone Builders, LLC. et al
as 4:2011cv00149
Plaintiff:
The United States of America, for the use of Floor Crete Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Salamone Builders, LLC., S4b, Inc., Archer Western Contractors, Ltd. and others
Cross_claimant:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, . and Archer Western Contractors, Ltd.
Cross_defendant:
S4b, Inc. and Salamone Builders, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Ross Contracting, Inc. v. Archer Western Contractors, Ltd. et al
as 1:2011cv01451
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Ross Constructing, Inc.
Defendant:
Archer Western Contractors, Ltd. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Counter_defendant:
Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland and Ross Constructing, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Archer Western Contractors, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
United States of America for the use of Stark Truss Company, Inc. v. Gateway Panel, Inc., et al
as 5:2010cv00422
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use of Stark Truss Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Grau Contracting, Inc., Gateway Panel, Inc., Archer Western Contractors, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
United States of America for the use of Stark Truss Company, Inc. v. Gateway Panel, Inc., et al
as 4:2010cv00140
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use of Stark Truss Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Grau Contracting, Inc., Gateway Panel, Inc., Archer Western Contractors, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
United States of America et al v. Archer Western Contractors, Ltd., Corp et al
as 5:2010cv01431
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Tony Abyad
Defendant:
Archer Western Contractors, Ltd., Corp, Postel Industries, Inc. and ABC Surety
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lusk Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Archer Western Contractors, LTD et al
as 3:2010cv00144
Plaintiff:
Lusk Mechanical Contractors, Inc., Lusk Mechanical Contractors, Inc. and Lusk Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
Defendant:
Archer Western Contractors, LTD and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ARCHER WESTERN DEMARIA JOINT VENTURE et al
as 1:2009cv00252
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FUBA DYNAMIC CONCRETE PUMPING INC A FLORIDA CORPORATION
Defendant:
ARCHER WESTERN DEMARIA JOINT VENTURE A FOREIGN JOINT VENTURE, ARCHER WESTERN CONTRACTORS LTD, DEMARIA BUILDING COMPANY A FOREIGN CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
