Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02812
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv10555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
King v. Wollner et al
as 1:2011cv02828
Plaintiff:
Graham J. King
Defendant:
Ron Wollner , Computer Data Source, Inc. and Michael Singleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00960
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv04000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
American Commerce Insurance Company v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2010cv00049
Plaintiff:
American Commerce Insurance Company
Defendant:
Courtney Michelle Hamilton, Jessie Dewayne Hamilton, Kimberly Ann Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
King v. American Mortgage Network et al
as 1:2009cv00125
Plaintiff:
Jason J. King
Defendant:
American Mortgage Network, Chase Home Finance and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Bank of New York v. Davis
as 2:2009cv10878
Plaintiff:
Bank of New York and Bank of New York
Defendant:
Booker T Davis, III
Cross Defendant:
Donald J King and Trott and Trott
Cross Claimant:
Booker T Davis, III
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
XL Speciality Insurance Company v. King et al
as 1:2008cv02377
Plaintiff:
XL Speciality Insurance Company
Defendant:
Paul J King, Jr, Sandra Dixon Jiles and Sham Dabadghao
Cause Of Action: Diversity
King v. Cuna Mutual Group et al
as 1:2008cv03044
Plaintiff:
Betty J. King
Defendant:
Cuna Mutual Group, Mutual Insurance Society and Cuna Mutual Insurance Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
