Contract Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 47
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A. v. Diaz Construction Company, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00973
Plaintiff: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A.
Defendant: Diaz Construction Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Standard Marine & Ship Repair, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A.
as 6:2011cv01298
Plaintiff: Standard Marine & Ship Repair, Inc.
Defendant: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A. v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 0:2011cv61570
Plaintiff: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A.
Defendant: Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA. v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00015
Counter Defendant: LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, P.A. and NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, P.A.
Plaintiff: LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY and NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, P.A.
Counter Claimant: MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION COMPANY and others
Defendant: MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION COMPANY and PBM PRODUCTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, P.A. v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY et al
as 1:2011cv00026
Defendant: MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION COMPANY and PBM PRODUCTS, LLC
Plaintiff: NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
NATURE'S CHOICE CORPORATION v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, P.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv05813
Plaintiff: NATURE'S CHOICE CORPORATION
Defendant: NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, P.A. and CARLOS VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Welch Foods, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2261
Plaintiff - Appellant: WELCH FOODS, INC., A Cooperative
Defendant - Appellee: NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH P.A., ZURICH-AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and AXIS SURPLUS INSURANCE COMPANY
Type: Contract Insurance
Valley Forge Insurance Company v. Crum And Forster, et al
as 2:2010cv00630
Plaintiff: Valley Forge Insurance Company , Continental Casualty Company and National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford
Defendant: Crum And Forster Specialty Insurance Company, United States Fire Insurance Company, Crum And Forster Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
National Union Fire Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Continental Carbon Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv02379
Plaintiff: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh P.A.
Defendant: Continental Carbon Company
Counter_claimant: Continental Carbon Company
Counter_defendant: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Contract Insurance
Chartis Specialty Insurance Company et al v. Banner Supply Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2010cv00339
Plaintiff: Chartis Specialty Insurance Company, Chartis Specialty Insurance Company, Chartis Specialty Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Banner Supply Company, Banner Supply Company, Inc., Banner Supply Company Fort Myers, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?