Cases 31 - 40 of 2,172
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Porter
as 1:2024cv01401
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Bonnie L Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Outlaw et al
as 2:2024cv14077
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Ruth Outlaw and Susan M Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Arnold et al
as 2:2024cv14078
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Other:
Susan M. Arnold
Cross Defendant:
Ruth Outlaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Wells Fargo Bank,N.A. v. Outlaw et al
as 2:2024cv14076
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank,N.A.
Defendant:
Ruth Outlaw and Susan M Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Digges v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 9:2024cv80282
Plaintiff:
Carol E Digges
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Digges v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 9:2024cv80283
Plaintiff:
Carol E Digges
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Arif et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 4:2024cv04044
Plaintiff:
Maher Arif, Brad Ellish, Batmadakh Choijin and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Garrett, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 24-8013
Plaintiff:
CAROL W. GARRETT and TERRY LEE GARRETT
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
Healy v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Patrick Healy
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. and Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Adelman et al
as 8:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
MARALYN H ADELMAN, TOYAR ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, INC. and Maralyn H. Adelman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
