Cases 81 - 90 of 131
Indemnity Insurance Company of North America v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02304
Plaintiff:
Indemnity Insurance Company of North America
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. and UPS Supply Chain Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Orloff, et al v. UPS
as 10-35967
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT ORLOFF and DAREL HARDENBROOK
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Delaware corporation doing business in the State of Idaho
Robert Orloff v. UPS
as 10-35900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ORLOFF
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Delaware corporation doing business in the State of Idaho
Collins Lum et al v. Americas Collectibles Network Inc et al
as 8:2010cv01269
Defendant:
Americas Collectibles Network Inc and United Parcel Services Inc
Plaintiff:
Collins Lum and Darrian Lum
Reisdorf v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2010cv01125
Plaintiff:
Edward Reisdorf
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 1471
ViaViente Taiwan, LP v. UPS
as 10-11423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIAVIENTE TAIWAN, LP
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Geneve Time Corporation v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02188
Defendant:
DOES and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Geneve Time Corporation
Starke v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2010cv01225
Plaintiff:
Adam Starke
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sharps Compliance, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 4:2010cv00300
Plaintiff:
Sharps Compliance, Inc.
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Starboard Marine, LLC v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00602
Plaintiff:
Starboard Marine, LLC
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
