Cases 1 - 6 of 6
PIONEER BUSINESS CONSULTING, LLC v. AMERICAN TELECONFERENCING SERVICES, LTD.
as 3:2022cv05615
Plaintiff:
PIONEER BUSINESS CONSULTING, LLC
Defendant:
AMERICAN TELECONFERENCING SERVICES, LTD. doing business as PREMIERE GLOBAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HCL America Inc. et al v. American Teleconferencing Services, Ltd.
as 1:2022cv00139
Counter Defendant:
HCL America Inc., HCL Technologies Limited and HCL Technologies Corporate Services Ltd.
Defendant:
American Teleconferencing Services, Ltd. doing business as Premiere Global Services, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
American Teleconferencing Services, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pacific Oak SOR Georgia 400 Center, LLC v. American Teleconferencing Services, Ltd.
as 1:2021cv03780
Plaintiff:
Pacific Oak SOR Georgia 400 Center, LLC
Defendant:
American Teleconferencing Services, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maverick Industries, Inc. v. American Teleconferencing
as 12-10102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAVERICK INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, doing business as National Communication Services
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN TELECONFERENCING SERVICES, LTD., doing business as Premiere Global Services, Incorporated
Maverick Industries, Inc. v. American Teleconferencing Services, Ltd.
as 3:2010cv00389
Plaintiff:
Maverick Industries, Inc. and Maverick Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
American Teleconferencing Services, Ltd. and American Teleconferencing Services, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
American Teleconferencing Services, Ltd. v. White et al
as 0:2008cv05967
Plaintiff:
American Teleconferencing Services, Ltd., American Teleconferencing Services, Ltd. and American Teleconferencing Services, Ltd.
Defendant:
Julie White and Intercall, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
