Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SELTZ v. SWEPI LP
as 1:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
CAROL SPELLMAN SELTZ, SUMNER R. BEMIS, GEORGENE BEMIS and others
Defendant:
SWEPI LP, SWEPI LLC, SHELL ENERGY HOLDING GP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Qualizza v. Freeman
as 1:2023cv05062
Plaintiff:
Michael S Qualizza
Defendant:
Neil D. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
U.S. Bank, National Association v. Qualizza et al
as 4:2021cv00120
Defendant:
Michael S Qualizza, Neil D Freeman, Timothy J Dixon and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WARNER et al v. SWEPI, LP et al
as 1:2019cv00326
Plaintiff:
RICHARD W. ZINK, JOHN L. STEWART, GILDA GIANCOLA and others
Defendant:
SWEPI, LP and SHELL ENERGY HOLDING GP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Hasbrouck, et al v. Peter Traber, et al
as 16-10359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. HASBROUCK and SUI YIP
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER G. TRABER, JAMES C. CZIRR, JACK W. CALLICUTT and others
Hasbrouck v. Traber et al
as 1:2015cv00208
Plaintiff:
David L Hasbrouck
Defendant:
Peter G. Traber , James C. Czirr , Jack W. Callicutt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yip v. Traber et al
as 2:2014cv01383
Defendant:
Gilbert F. Amelio, Jack W. Callicutt, James C. Czirr and others
Nominal Defendant:
Galectin Therapeutics Inc
Plaintiff:
Sui Yip
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hasbrouck v. Traber et al
as 3:2014cv00402
Defendant:
Gilbert F. Amelio, Jack W. Callicutt, James C. Czirr and others
Nominal Defendant:
Galectin Therapeutics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David L Hasbrouck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
