Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Bolen et al
as 2:2024cv10474
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Maverick Bolen, David Patterson, Caroline Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
JACKSON HEWITT INC v. PATTERSON et al
as 2:2022cv00808
Plaintiff:
JACKSON HEWITT INC
Defendant:
KAVE ENTERPRISES, LLC, DAVID PATTERSON and KAY PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Patterson et al v. State Farm LLoyds
as 3:2020cv00004
Defendant:
State Farm LLoyds
Plaintiff:
David Patterson and Margaret Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2019cv04964
Defendant:
United Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
Plaintiff:
David Patterson, Barbara Patterson and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Patterson et al v. United Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
as 4:2019cv04959
Defendant:
United Property & Casualty Insurance Co. and Kevin Brooks
Plaintiff:
David Patterson and Barbara Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCullough, Jr. v. Medite Cancer Diagnostics, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10554
Plaintiff:
Robert F McCullough, Jr
Defendant:
Medite Cancer Diagnostics, Inc., David Patterson, Michael Ott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATTERSON v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2015cv00634
Plaintiff:
DAVID PATTERSON, Jr.
Defendant:
Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Genesis Biosciences, Inc. v. Patterson
as 1:2015cv02023
Plaintiff:
Genesis Biosciences, Inc.
Defendant:
David Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Patterson v. Gerald Anderson
as 13-6029
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellant:
GERALD ANDERSON
Patterson v. Anderson
as 3:2010cv00464
Plaintiff:
David Patterson
Defendant:
Gerald Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
