Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Stephen Edwards v. PHH Mortgage Corp, et al
as 22-2759
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN S. EDWARDS
Defendant / Appellee:
PHH MORTGAGE CORP, DLA PIPER, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC and others
Wilson v. GMFS Mortgage et al
as 3:2022cv00478
Plaintiff:
Murphy Jermaine Wilson
Defendant:
GMFS Mortgage, Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, Tom Millon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EDWARDS v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2022cv03926
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN S. EDWARDS
Defendant:
PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, DLA PIPER LLP, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Washington v. Equifax Credit Bureau
as 1:2019cv03723
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. Washington
Defendant:
Equifax Credit Bureau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03594
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv01495
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Experian Marketing Solutions, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen S Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dreni v. Equifax Credit Information Services
as 1:2018cv05816
Defendant:
Equifax Credit Information Services
Plaintiff:
Denis Dreni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Link v. Equifax Credit Information Services
as 1:2018cv05620
Plaintiff:
Dennis W Link
Defendant:
Equifax Credit Information Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Link v. Equifax Credit Information Services Incorporated
as 1:2018cv05621
Plaintiff:
Denise G Link
Defendant:
Equifax Credit Information Services Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDWARDS v. EQUIFAX INFO. SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2018cv02314
Defendant:
Equifax Credit Information Services
Plaintiff:
TANILLE EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
