Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 918
CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01231
Plaintiff: CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER, CHARLTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, CHILTON MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Unknown Plaintiff v. Unknown Defendant
as 7:2024cv02882
Plaintiff: Unknown Plaintiff
Defendant: Unknown Defendant
Other: joe smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3301 Fraudulent Transfer Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00800
Plaintiff: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, ANAHEIM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, WHITTIER HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Unknown Plaintiff v. Consolidated Edison, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01501
Defendant: Consolidated Edison, Inc. and Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.
Plaintiff: Unknown Plaintiff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff-IgnoreThisCase v. Defendant-IgnoreThisCase
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff: Test Plaintiff-IgnoreThisCase
Defendant: Test Defendant-IgnoreThisCase
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437 Federal Election Commission
Type: Contract Miller Act
Alexandra Yonkov v. Maximus Holding Group LLC, et al
as 24-3056
Plaintiff: ALEXANDRA YONKOV, Individually and derivatively on behalf of Maximus Holding Group LLC
Defendant: MAXIMUS HOLDING GROUP LLC, BRICKHAUS MANAGEMENT, INC., ANDREW E. BRICKMAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv11111
Plaintiff: Plaintiff
Defendant: Defendant
Type: Contract Insurance
Northern Division Shell Case
as 1:2024cv01000
Plaintiff: Plaintiff(s)
Defendant: Defendant(s)
Central Division Shell Case
as 3:2024cv03000
Plaintiff: Plaintiff(s)
Defendant: Defendant(s)
Southern Division Shell Case
as 4:2024cv04000
Plaintiff: Plaintiff(s)
Defendant: Defendant(s)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?