Cases 1 - 10 of 15
McCall v. Sentry Select Ins Co
as 3:2022cv00645
Plaintiff:
Kyle McCall
Defendant:
Sentry Select Ins Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MAY v. SELECTIVE INS. CO. OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00910
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAY
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INS. CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
LAUX et al v. WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv01271
Plaintiff:
Regina Laux and Jeffrey Laux
Defendant:
AMERICAN SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY, WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, WESTFIELD NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEELER et al v. SELECTIVE INS. CO. OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv06543
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY PEELER and MANDY PEELER
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INS. CO. OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
MANKS et al v. SELECTIVE INS. CO. OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv06350
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. MANKS and SUSAN D. MANKS
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INS. CO. OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
MAMAKOS v. SELECTIVE INS. CO. OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv05546
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MAMAKOS
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INS. CO. OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
HOFFMAN et al v. SELECTIVE INS. CO. OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv05409
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HOFFMAN and MARY R. HOFFMAN
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INS. CO. OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
MARRERO v. SELECTIVE INS. CO. OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv04808
Plaintiff:
FELIPE MARRERO
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INS. CO. OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001
Albert Hankinson v. Amer W Home Ins Co, et al
as 09-2060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT HANKINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
AMER W HOME INS CO, GUIC INS CO, NKA Amer Modern Select Ins Co, AMER MODERN INS GRP and others
Casey Elec LLC v. Construction Mgmt Svcs, Inc et al
as 3:2009cv00469
Plaintiff:
Casey Elec LLC
Defendant:
Construction Mgmt Svcs, Inc and Selective Ins Co of Amer
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
