Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Annamalai v. US Department of the Treasury et al
as 3:2022cv02038
Defendant:
Annamalai Annamalai, Department of the Treasury, Comptroller General of the United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Sorrow v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2020cv00169
Plaintiff:
Loyd Landon Sorrow
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Pompeo et al
as 2:2019cv00755
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Colonel Gene Spaulding, Carmine Marceno and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Alexander Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Sellers et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv00155
Petitioner:
Fane R Sellers and Steven Babcock
Respondent:
United States of America, United States of America President and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
John Dickson, Jr. v. US
as 14-1861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN MALCOLM DICKSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dickson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv00254
Plaintiff:
John Malcolm Dickson, Jr.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Department Of Justice and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
AKUFU EL v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2012cv06501
Plaintiff:
NANYA AKUFU EL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY PAUL J. FISHMAN and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Dugas v. Walker et al
as 2:2010cv12275
Plaintiff:
Robert D Dugas
Defendant:
Linda Walker, United States Attorney General and United States Attorney
Ho v. USCIS
as 1:2007cv00002
Plaintiff:
Jianjiang Ho
Defendant:
USCIS, USCIS, USCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
