Cases 211 - 220 of 232,811
Navog LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc.
as 2:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Navog LLC
Defendant:
Verizon Communications Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Navog LLC v. Sygic a. s.
as 2:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Navog LLC
Defendant:
Sygic a. s.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
GoSecure, Inc. v. CrowdStrike, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
GoSecure, Inc.
Defendant:
CrowdStrike, Inc. and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Tycon Systems Inc v. Tycon Security Advantage System LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Tycon Systems Inc
Defendant:
Tycon Security Advantage System LLC and Frank Vuong
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jorge v. Vimeo.com, Inc.
as 24-1252
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL JORGE
Defendant:
VIMEO.COM INC. and VIMEO.COM, INC.
VDPP, LLC v. Vivitek Corporation
as 3:2024cv01781
Plaintiff:
VDPP, LLC
Defendant:
Vivitek Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sweet People Apparel, Inc. v. Gracing Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02305
Plaintiff:
SWEET PEOPLE APPAREL, INC., dba MISS ME, Sweet People Apparel, Inc. doing business as Miss Me, a California corporation and Victory 2020, LLC California limited liability company doing business as Miss Me
Defendant:
GRACING INC. dba GRACE IN LA, Gracing Inc. a California corporation doing business as Grace in LA and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Andrew Kamal v. Femtosense, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00967
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kamal
Defendant:
Femtosense, Inc. and Sam Fok
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Sebastien Reant et al v. Lutece Gallery, LLC
as 2:2024cv02302
Plaintiff:
Sebastien Reant and Amanda Reant
Defendant:
Lutece Gallery, LLC and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
