Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Therapy Stores, Inc. v. JGV Apparel Group, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv02588
Plaintiff:
Therapy Stores, Inc.
Defendant:
JGV Apparel Group, LLC and Lane Crawford, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Simplified Foods LLC v. Gordon et al
as 1:2016cv00595
Plaintiff:
Simplified Foods LLC
Defendant:
Andrew Gordon and Sarah Crawford
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
DAUGHTRY v. ANDREWS et al
as 1:2014cv00984
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADAM DAUGHTRY
Defendant:
RYAN ANDREWS, SCOTT CRAWFORD and MARK PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Crawford v. Bangladesh Records, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00189
Plaintiff:
Alex Crawford
Defendant:
Bangladesh Records, Inc., Bangladesh Production Company, Inc., Rockstar Games, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Alexia Crawford, Inc v. MCO Global LLC
as 1:2014cv00514
Plaintiff:
Alexia Crawford, Inc
Defendant:
MCO Global LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kitsch LLC v. Alexia Crawford Inc
as 2:2013cv06383
Defendant:
Alexia Crawford Inc
Plaintiff:
Kitsch LLC
BWP MEDIA USA INC. v. CRAWFORD BROADCASTING COMPANY
as 2:2013cv03449
Plaintiff:
BWP MEDIA USA INC.
Defendant:
CRAWFORD BROADCASTING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
ANDREWS et al v. DAUGHTRY
as 1:2013cv00408
Plaintiff:
RYAN ANDREWS , SCOTT CRAWFORD and MARK PERRY
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER ADAM DAUGHTRY
Counter_claimant:
CHRISTOPHER ADAM DAUGHTRY
Counter_defendant:
RYAN ANDREWS , SCOTT CRAWFORD and MARK PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lane Crawford L.L.C. v. Therapy L.L.C.
as 1:2013cv00534
Plaintiff:
Lane Crawford L.L.C.
Defendant:
Therapy L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Lane Crawford L.L.C. v. Kelex Trading (CA) Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv09190
Plaintiff:
Lane Crawford L.L.C.
Defendant:
Kelex Trading (CA) Inc. , Ka Wa Choi and Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
