Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Ahab Nafal v. Jay Z, et al
as 12-55615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AHAB JOSEPH NAFAL, an individual, AKA Julian
Defendant - Appellee:
JAY Z, an individual, AKA Shawn Carter, TIMOTHY MOSELY, an individual, BOB BOURDON, an individual and others
Farrell v. Kappos
as 1:2011cv01397
Plaintiff:
John Farrell
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154
Slep Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Centerstage Productions et al
as 2:2011cv10460
Defendant:
Centerstage Productions, Tony DeFazio, Art Farrell and others
Plaintiff:
Slep Tone Entertainment Corporation
Ahab Jseph Nafal v. Jay Z et al
as 2:2011cv06238
Defendant:
Big Bad Mr Hahn Music, Chester Binnington, Bob Bourdan and others
Plaintiff:
Ahab Joseph Nafal
Clean Wood Recycling, Inc. v. Farrell's Lawn and Garden Center and Lawn Service, LLC
as 3:2011cv01009
Plaintiff:
Clean Wood Recycling, Inc.
Defendant:
Farrell's Lawn & Garden Center and Lawn Service, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Farrell's Extreme Bodyshaping, Inc. v. KSM Clive, LLC d/b/a Kosama
as 4:2010cv00448
Plaintiff:
Farrell's Extreme Bodyshaping, Inc.
Defendant:
KSM Clive, LLC d/b/a Kosama
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Alderete v. Farrell & Seldin
as 1:2009cv01097
Defendant:
Farrell & Seldin
Plaintiff:
Kimberlee Alderete
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Shoemoney Media Group, Inc. v. Farrell
as 8:2009cv00131
Plaintiff:
Shoemoney Media Group, Inc. and Shoemoney Media Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Keyen Farrell and John J. Farrell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Farrell v. VT Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00158
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lorne Farrell
Defendant:
VT Inc. and State Of Florida
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hollywood Hair, Inc. v. Farrell et al
as 8:2008cv01424
Plaintiff:
Hollywood Hair, Inc.
Defendant:
Richard Farrell and Does 1 - 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
