Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Dragon Claw (U.S.A.), Inc. v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 2:2010cv06434
Defendant:
Commend Hong Kong Ltd. Trading Company, Does, Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dragon Claw (U.S.A.), Inc.
LA Printex Industries, Inc. v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv06252
Defendant:
Concord Buying Group, Inc., Does, J.C. Penney Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
LA Printex Industries, Inc.
Hardy Way, LLC v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 2:2010cv05732
Defendant:
Does and The Kroger Co.
Plaintiff:
Hardy Way, LLC
Polymer Group, Inc. et al v. Magla Products LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00288
Plaintiff:
Polymer Group, Inc. , PGI Polymer, Inc. and Chicopee, Inc.
Defendant:
Magla Products LLC and The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Asher v. Kroger Co., The
as 1:2010cv01469
Plaintiff:
Randall S. Asher
Defendant:
Kroger Co., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
LA Printex Industries, Inc. v. Bealls, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03704
Defendant:
Bealls, Inc., Belk, Inc., Burlington Coat Factory Direct Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
LA Printex Industries, Inc.
Slatzer v. Time, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03281
Plaintiff:
Deborah Slatzer
Defendant:
Time, Inc., Time Inc. Home Entertainment, Anderson News Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Excentus Corporation v. The Kroger Co.,
as 3:2010cv00483
Plaintiff:
Excentus Corporation
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Kroger Co. et al v. Excentus Corporation
as 1:2010cv00161
Plaintiff:
Kroger Co. , Kroger Limited Partnership I , Kroger Co. of Michigan and others
Defendant:
Excentus Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Gildersleeve Holdings AG LLC v. Autozone, Inc., et al
as 2:2010cv00031
Plaintiff:
Gildersleeve Holdings AG LLC
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc.,, The Kroger Co.,, Classmates Media Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
