Cases 51 - 60 of 161
SRAM, LLC v. Shoemaker
as 1:2017cv07069
Plaintiff:
SRAM, LLC
Defendant:
Glenn Shoemaker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Dickerson v. Valtech, LLC
as 1:2017cv06575
Plaintiff:
Glenn Dickerson
Defendant:
Valtech, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Valtech, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Glenn Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Reed v. Ezelle Investment Properties Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01364
Defendant:
Does 1-10 inclusive, Glenn D. Ezelle, Jr. and Ezelle Investment Properties Inc.
Plaintiff:
Aaron C. Reed
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Glenn Family Inc v. Combex Inc
as 2:2017cv01173
Plaintiff:
Glenn Family Inc
Defendant:
Combex Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
XODUS MEDICAL INC. et al v. G&T INDUSTRIES
as 2:2017cv01123
Plaintiff:
XODUS MEDICAL INC , ALESSIO PIGAZZI and GLENN KEILAR
Defendant:
G&T INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
State Regulatory Registry LLC v. Bartholomew et al
as 1:2017cv01834
Plaintiff:
State Regulatory Registry LLC
Defendant:
Billy Glenn Bartholomew , MTI Services Corporation and Carey Green
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
XODUS MEDICAL, INC. et al v. THE SOULE CO.
as 2:2017cv00607
Plaintiff:
XODUS MEDICAL, INC. , ALESSIO PIGAZZI and GLENN KEILAR
Defendant:
THE SOULE CO.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
XODUS MEDICAL, INC. et al v. ALLEN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2017cv00581
Plaintiff:
XODUS MEDICAL, INC. , ALESSIO PIGAZZI and GLENN KEILAR
Defendant:
ALLEN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
State of the Art Construction, Inc. v. Jennifer Spencer et al
as 2:2017cv02411
Defendant:
DOES, Christopher Glenn Hayman and Jennifer Spencer
Plaintiff:
State of the Art Construction, Inc.
GAE GROUP, LLC et al v. CARGO EQUIPMENT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv09431
Plaintiff:
GAE GROUP, LLC and GLENN EHRGOTT
Defendant:
CARGO EQUIPMENT CORPORATION and JEFFREY S IDEN
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
