Cases 51 - 60 of 142
Servpro Intellectual Property, Inc. et al v. Proserve Restoration and Cleaning, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00899
Defendant:
Richard Peterson and Proserve Restoration and Cleaning, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Servpro Industries, Inc. and Servpro Intellectual Property, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Wild v. Peterson
as 2:2015at01304
Plaintiff:
Alexander L. Wild
Defendant:
Dean B. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Wild v. Peterson
as 2:2015cv02602
Plaintiff:
Alexander L. Wild
Defendant:
Dean B. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Go Beyond, Ltd. et al v. Peterson et al
as 4:2015cv00312
Plaintiff:
Go Beyond, Ltd. , Brandi Marino and Beyond Pedaling, LLC
Defendant:
Kerry Peterson, Kelsey Howard and Beyond Pedaling II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Peterson v. Blue Goose PDX, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00848
Plaintiff:
Jill E. Peterson
Defendant:
Blue Goose PDX, Inc. and Kristine J. Craine
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Peking Handicraft, Inc. v. Dermond Peterson Design, LLC
as 3:2014cv05315
Plaintiff:
Peking Handicraft, Inc.
Defendant:
Dermond Peterson Design, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Bandit Industries, Inc. v. Peterson Pacific Corp.
as 2:2014cv13920
Defendant:
Peterson Pacific Corp., an Oregon corporation
Plaintiff:
Bandit Industries, Inc., a Michigan corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Peterson v. National Football League et al
as 0:2014cv04005
Plaintiff:
Calvin E. Peterson
Defendant:
National Football League, NFL Films, Inc. and NFL Productions, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Dermond Peterson Design LLC v. JLA Home Inc et al
as 2:2014cv06300
Defendant:
Amazon, Inc, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc, Belk Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Dermond Peterson Design LLC
Dermond Peterson Design LLC v. One Kings Lane, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05534
Plaintiff:
Dermond Peterson Design LLC
Defendant:
Does, One Kings Lane, Inc. and Susan Feldman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
