Cases 71 - 80 of 114
Coach, Inc. et al v. Does 1-100
as 1:2012cv08963
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-100 doing business as the aliases identified on Schedule "A", Lin Feng, Natasha Kawas and others
Garnishee:
Hongsong Deng
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Chanel, Inc. v. Hollywood Too, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv04207
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
Hollywood Too, LLC and Katy Chan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
PAIR NETWORKS, INC. v. SOON et al
as 2:2012cv00896
Plaintiff:
PAIR NETWORKS, INC.
Defendant:
LIM CHENG SOON and RICHERD CHAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Richemont North America, Inc. et al v. Huang et al
as 1:2012cv04443
Defendant:
Xiao Kang Lu, Shun Da Enterprises, XYZ Companies 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Richemont North America, Inc. , Cartier International A.G. and Cartier
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Tiffany (NJ), LLC v. Hollywood Too, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv02585
Plaintiff:
Tiffany (NJ), LLC
Defendant:
Hollywood Too, LLC, Katy Chan and Fu Mei Qing
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01803
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sanrio, Inc. et al v. Chan
as 4:2012cv01040
Plaintiff:
Sanrio, Inc. , Disney Enterprises, Inc. , Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. and others
Defendant:
Lester Chan
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Roof Deck Entertainment LLC et al v. Investissements Forum Canadian Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv08562
Plaintiff:
Roof Deck Entertainment LLC and 10th Avenue Hospital Group LLC
Defendant:
Investissements Forum Canadian Inc., 9173-1273 Quebec Inc., Jack Dushey and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Channing Bete Company, Inc. v. SELmedia, Inc.
as 3:2011cv30251
Plaintiff:
Channing Bete Company, Inc.
Defendant:
SELmedia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Chan v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 2:2011cv01766
Plaintiff:
Hark C. Chan
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
