Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Trudell Medical International v. D R Burton Healthcare, LLC
as 23-1777
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRUDELL MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL
Counter Defendant:
MONAGHAN MEDICAL CORP.
Not Yet Classified:
D R BURTON HEALTHCARE, LLC
Trudell Medical International v. D R Burton Healthcare, LLC
as 23-1779
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TRUDELL MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL
Counter Defendant:
MONAGHAN MEDICAL CORP.
Not Yet Classified:
D R BURTON HEALTHCARE, LLC
Trudell Medical International v. D R Burton Healthcare, LLC
as 4:2019cv00131
Plaintiff:
Trudell Medical International
Defendant:
D R Burton Healthcare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Trudell Medical International v. D R Burton Healthcare, LLC
as 4:2018cv00009
Plaintiff:
Trudell Medical International
Defendant:
D R Burton Healthcare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
IDEAVILLAGE PRODUCTS CORP. v. BRETT SAEVITZON et al
as 2:2011cv07548
Plaintiff:
IDEAVILLAGE PRODUCTS CORP.
Defendant:
BRETT SAEVITZON , ALL THE J'S LLC , SPOT ON DIRECT RESPONSE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
D&R COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. GARETT et al
as 3:2011cv00413
Plaintiff:
D&R COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN GARETT and GARETT GROUP, INC.
Mediator:
ROSLYN S. HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. D & R Dana, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv07117
Defendant:
D & R Charis, Inc., D & R Dana Clothing, Inc., D & R Dana, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Disney Enterprises, Inc.
Commerce Capital, LP v. Krickovic et al
as 1:2009cv07249
Plaintiff:
Commerce Capital, LP
Defendant:
Stephen P. Krickovic, Happy J. Krickovic and D & R Ventures, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Bebe Studio, Inc. et al v. Zakkos et al
as 3:2008cv01462
Plaintiff:
Bebe Studio, Inc., Bebe Studio, Inc., Bebe Studio, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Zakkos, The Outlet by Zakkos Plata, JM Distributors and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
