Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Protective Industrial Products, Inc. v. Boss Innovation and Marketing, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Protective Industrial Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Boss Innovation & Marketing, Inc. d/b/a Boss Safety Products and Boss Innovation and Marketing, Inc. doing business as Boss Safety Products
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Protective Industrial Products, Inc. v. Boss Innovation and Marketing, Inc.
as 8:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Protective Industrial Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Boss Innovation and Marketing, Inc. doing business as Boss Safety Products
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Harper Trucks Inc v. Gleason Industrial Products Inc
as 3:2022cv00566
Plaintiff:
Harper Trucks Inc
Defendant:
Gleason Industrial Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Zeus Industrial Products, Inc. v. Junkosha Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00889
Plaintiff:
Zeus Industrial Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Junkosha Inc. and Junkosha USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Kilts Resources LLC v. Wesco Industrial Products Inc
as 2:2011cv00163
Plaintiff:
Kilts Resources LLC
Defendant:
Wesco Industrial Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Rogers Industrial Products, Inc et al v. HF Rubber Manufacturing, Inc.
as 5:2009cv01181
Plaintiff:
Rogers Industrial Products, Inc and J.R.C.Leasing Co.
Defendant:
HF Rubber Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Drillmec v Branham et al
as 4:2009cv00307
Defendant:
Donald Branham, Charlotte Branham, Branham Industries, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Drillmec, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tippmann Industrial Products Inc v. Tandy Leather Factory Inc
as 1:2007cv00307
Plaintiff:
Tippmann Industrial Products Inc and Tippmann Industrial Products Inc
Defendant:
Tandy Leather Factory Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
