Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MAACO Franchisor SPV LLC v. Villeda et al
as 8:2021cv02811
Plaintiff:
MAACO Franchisor SPV LLC
Defendant:
Jorge Villeda, Eliu Rivera and Villeda Signature Automotive LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Maaco Franchisor SPV LLC v. Mgboji
as 4:2021cv02505
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchisor SPV LLC
Defendant:
Jolly O. Mgboji
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC v. Sadwick, et al
as 3:2020cv00147
Defendant:
Gregg A. Sadwick and Greba Corporation
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Maaco Franchising, LLC v. Boensch et al
as 3:2016cv00155
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
Jeffrey R. Boensch, Lori J. Boensch, Ronald E. Eason and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Maaco Franchising, LLC v. King Collision Center et al
as 2:2014cv09754
Defendant:
Does, King Collision Center and Shaun P. Moise
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchising, LLC
MAACO FRANCHISING, LLC v. VETTORINO
as 2:2014cv02583
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, LLC
Defendant:
JOSEPH V. VETTORINO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. WENDKOS et al
as 2:2012cv06194
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN WENDKOS, SUSAN WENDKOS, STACY DAVID, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2012cv02698
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
CARLOS YOUNG, STACY YOUNG, BRENDA FAIRCHILD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. GAARDER et al
as 2:2011cv03087
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
JAMES M. GAARDER and MCC HUMBLE AUTO PAINT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. LOFIG, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv02284
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
LOFIG, INC., KEVIN E. FITZGERALD and DANA G. FITZGERALD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
