Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Libertarian Natl Comm, Inc. v. Michael Saliba, et al
as 23-1856
Plaintiff / Appellee: LIBERTARIAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, INC.
Defendant / Appellant: MICHAEL J. SALIBA, RAFAEL WOLF, GREG STEMPFLE and others
Libertarian National Committee, Inc.. v. Saliba et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv11074
Plaintiff: Libertarian National Committee, Inc..
Defendant: Michael J. Saliba, Rafael Wolf, Greg stempfle and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Libertarian Nat'l Committee, Inc. v. Dean
as 3:2023cv00155
Plaintiff: Libertarian National Committee, Inc. and Libertarian Nat'l Committee, Inc.
Defendant: Robert Klor Dean
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Republican National Committee v. Canegata et al
as 3:2022cv00037
Plaintiff: Republican National Committee
Defendant: Mr. John Canegata, robert schanfarber, VIGOP (Virgin Islands Republican Party a/k/a VIGOP PAC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Servants of Jesus and Mary, Inc. v. The National Committee for the National Pilgrim Virgin of Canada, et al.
as 1:2018cv00731
Plaintiff: SERVANTS OF JESUS AND MARY, INC., d/b/a THE FATIMA CENTER and Servants of Jesus and Mary, Inc.
Defendant: THE FATIMA CENTER U.S.A., INC., ANDREW CESANEK and THE NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR THE NATIONAL PILGRIM VIRGIN OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Peterman v. Republican National Committee We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2017cv00066
Plaintiff: Erika Peterman
Defendant: Republican National Committee
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
MacKay v. Crews
as 14-1566
Plaintiff: Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant: Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee: Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
MacKay v. Crews
as 14-836
Plaintiff: Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant: Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee: Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
MacKay v. Crews
as 13-4140
Plaintiff: Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant: Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee: Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
MacKay v. Crew
as 12-5039
Plaintiff: Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant: Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee: Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?