Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Sadowski v. Vision General Contractors of GA, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sadowski
Defendant:
Vision General Contractors of GA, LLC and Robert D. Timm
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Heartland Business Systems LLC v. Timm et al
as 1:2017cv01307
Plaintiff:
Heartland Business Systems LLC
Defendant:
Jason Timm and CJ 27 Strategies LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Vivid Sites, LLC v. Millsap et al
as 4:2017cv01231
Plaintiff:
Vivid Sites, LLC
Defendant:
Timothy Millsap, Matthew Timme, Daniel Benninger and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Vivid Sites, LLC v. Millsap et al
as 4:2016cv00117
Plaintiff:
Vivid Sites, LLC
Defendant:
Timothy Millsap , Matthew Timme , Daniel Benninger and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Cornerstone Onsite, LLC D/B/A Onsite Dental Solutions v. Onsite Health, Inc.
as 4:2014cv02789
Plaintiff:
Cornerstone Onsite, LLC D/B/A Onsite Dental Solutions
Defendant:
Onsite Health, Inc. and Peter Timm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
R.S. Scott Associates, Inc v. Timm Construction Co. et al
as 1:2014cv13338
Plaintiff:
R.S. Scott Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Timm Construction Compnay LLC and Rex D Reittenbach
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
World Cup Supply, Inc. et al v. GTI Sports et al
as 2:2012cv00153
Plaintiff:
World Cup Supply, Inc. , MBW Technologies, LLC and SPM S.p.A.
Defendant:
GTI Sports, Greg Timm and Bevann Timm
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
World Cup Supply, Inc. et al v. GTI Sports et al
as 1:2012cv00153
Plaintiff:
World Cup Supply, Inc. , MBW Technologies, LLC and SPM S.p.A.
Defendant:
GTI Sports, Greg Timm and Bevann Timm
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cynergy Ergonomics, Inc. v. Ergonomic Partners, Inc. et al.
as 4:2008cv00243
Plaintiff:
Cynergy Ergonomics, Inc.
Defendant:
Ergonomic Partners, Inc. and Matt Timme
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
