Cases 11 - 20 of 60
TORO et al v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2021cv14964
Plaintiff:
YANILDA A. TORO and YANISA D. QUINONES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
TORO et al v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2021cv13643
Plaintiff:
YANILDA ANNETTE TORO and YANISA DIAMOND QUINONES
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, TRINITAS PSYCHIATRIC WAR and TRINITAS PSYCHIATRIC WARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Quinones-Reyes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv01256
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Armando Quinones-Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
PRATT v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv06141
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
GLORIA ESTHER QUINONES PRATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PRATT v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv06176
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
GLORIA ESTHER QUINONES PRATTS and GLORIA ESTHER QUINONES PRATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Quinones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv06904
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Abraham Quinones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Quinones v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01582
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Esmeralda Quinones
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Quinones v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2020cv02171
Plaintiff:
Maurcy Quinones
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Garcia Quinones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv01335
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Margie Garcia Quinones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Quinones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2019cv00635
Plaintiff:
Hector Quinones
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
