Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Kimball v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 5:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Michael David Kimball
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kimball v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00222
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Glenn A Kimball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kimball v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2011cv00312
Plaintiff:
Rick Lee Kimball
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kimball v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2010cv01204
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Danny R. Kimball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kimball v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2010cv22780
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Kimball
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Kimball v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv00493
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Kimball
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kimball v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2009cv06251
Plaintiff:
Scott R. Kimball and Scott R. Kimball
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
KIMBALL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2009cv00066
Plaintiff:
CHARLES KIMBALL
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
KIMBALL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2007cv00115
Plaintiff:
JANINE KIMBALL
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Rogers v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2007cv00750
Plaintiff:
Kimball A. Rogers
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
