Cases 31 - 40 of 48,896
Faasu v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
James Faasu
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
King v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Billy James King
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ertz v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv02064
Plaintiff:
Karla LeAnn Ertz
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Minogue v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04227
Plaintiff:
Heidi L. Minogue
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 rsReview of HHS Decision (RSI)
Stanley v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Stanley
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Guerra Serra v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03304
Plaintiff:
Narciso Guerra Serra
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Briggs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00947
Plaintiff:
Laronda June Briggs
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Frew v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv01163
Plaintiff:
Dean R. Frew
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Michelle Edith Rosser v. Martin J. O Malley
as 2:2024cv04594
Plaintiff:
Michelle Edith Rosser
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rondeau v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv02049
Plaintiff:
James Rondeau
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
