Cases 41 - 50 of 334,080
Dolan v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04257
Plaintiff:
Sean Dolan
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MELTON v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02641
Plaintiff:
MICHELE ANNE MELTON
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
STATEN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv02655
Plaintiff:
DERRICK V. STATEN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MOUZON v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02664
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA DIASHIA MOUZON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Simmons v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration et al
as 4:2024cv03552
Plaintiff:
Antwan C Simmons
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Siegriest v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Andrew Siegriest
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Ellis v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Joy M. Ellis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Grigsby v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03088
Plaintiff:
James Grigsby
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mackey v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03089
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Mackey
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tappin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00860
Plaintiff:
Cheniqua Tappin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
