Cases 71 - 80 of 1,730
Atkins v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Quentin F. Atkins
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BENNETT v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02495
Plaintiff:
ANITA F. BENNETT
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RODAS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv07570
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL F RODAS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Goode v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv01428
Plaintiff:
Gerald F Goode and Gerald Francis Goode
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MARTIN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02422
Plaintiff:
Kimberly F. MARTIN o/b/o K.E.H, a minor and KIMBERLY F MARTIN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv07143
Plaintiff:
Sue F. Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Farr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00955
Plaintiff:
Gerald F Farr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bagley, Sr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv06545
Plaintiff:
Andre F Bagley, Sr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nunez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv10265
Plaintiff:
Keyla F Nunez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Anderson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv01442
Plaintiff:
Adam F Anderson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
