Cases 81 - 90 of 158
SCHVAMBERG v. SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OF THE UNITED STATES
as 2:2011cv00192
Plaintiff:
JOANNE M. SCHVAMBERG
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Young v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 4:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
Mattie Young
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lombard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 2:2011cv10028
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff:
Michael Richard Lombard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Flythe v. Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services
as 1:2010cv09069
Plaintiff:
Cora L. Flythe
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CURRIE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY et al
as 2:2010cv05757
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CURRIE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bryan Jack v. Michael Astrue, Commissioner
as 10-31002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN WAYNE JACK
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Maxquindom, Inc. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 2:2010cv07638
Plaintiff:
Maxquindom, Inc.
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Murray v. Secretary of Health & Human Se
as 10-3300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charlyn D. Murray
Defendant - Appellee:
Secretary of Health & Human Services, Michael Leavitt
Mississippi Care Ctr of Morton v. Michael Leavitt
as 10-60594
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MISSISSIPPI CARE CENTER OF MORTON, L.L.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL O LEAVITT, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Maxquindom, Inc. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 2:2010cv05268
Plaintiff:
Maxquindom, Inc.
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
