Cases 1 - 10 of 1,730
Young, III v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Billy F Young, III
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Amaya v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03766
Plaintiff:
Hector F. Amaya
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
POWERS v. OMALLEY
as 2:2024cv02157
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY F. POWERS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carrello v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03543
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Carrello
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Updike v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Peter F Updike
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Derenze v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv02900
Plaintiff:
Stephen F. Derenze
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
RALPH JR. v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F. RALPH JR.
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Conrad v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01819
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Mary F. Conrad
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Easley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Joseph F Easley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Reason v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02965
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Reason
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
