Cases 1 - 10 of 927
Hill v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Amy Hill
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Carlson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Amy B. Carlson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Friedman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Amy E. Friedman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Morris v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01350
Plaintiff:
Amy Patricia Morris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
Amy Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Collier v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00108
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Amy Collier
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Soliday v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Amy Jo Soliday
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Goodwin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Amy Goodwin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Pearson v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Amy Pearson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Eddington v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Amy Marie Eddington
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
