Cases 1 - 10 of 709
Prucey v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Edward Eugene Prucey
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Parmer v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
William Eugene Parmer
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Asher v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00143
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Alan Eugene Asher
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Paul Eugene Poindexter v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv05794
Plaintiff:
Paul Eugene Poindexter
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bey v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv02987
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Jamar Eugene Butler Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Long v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05044
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Nathan Eugene Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Baca v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01612
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Eugene Baca
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lamblin v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00058
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Eugene D. Lamblin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kosolapov v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03174
Plaintiff:
Eugene Kosolapov
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Curtis Eugene Jung v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Curtis Eugene Jung
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
