Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Williams v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2023cv01140
Plaintiff:
Joseph Williams
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sweeney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
Joseph William Sweeney, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv04473
Plaintiff:
Joseph Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv06113
Plaintiff:
Joseph Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Boisvert v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv00035
Plaintiff:
Joseph William Boisvert
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Frangione v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv01298
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Joseph William Frangione
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Lannom v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv00069
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Plaintiff:
Joseph William Lannom, III
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FLYTHE v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00591
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WILLIAM FLYTHE
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dobbs v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2017cv00765
Plaintiff:
Joseph William Dobbs, Sr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BRANDAU v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv01411
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WILLIAM BRANDAU
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
