Cases 1 - 10 of 1,538
Dixon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05386
Plaintiff:
Paul Dixon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Guerra v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Paul Lennon Guerra
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Malcomb v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
Paul Wayne Malcomb
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HAYDEN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05970
Plaintiff:
PAUL JOSEPH HAYDEN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McGirr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Justin Paul McGirr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Frazier v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00842
Plaintiff:
Paul R. Frazier, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Tereshko v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03353
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paul Tereshko
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sukalich v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Corey Paul Edward Sukalich
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ROMANICK v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
PAUL SHANE ROMANICK
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Paul Conklin v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03437
Plaintiff:
Paul Conklin
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
