Cases 1 - 10 of 275
Patterson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04167
Plaintiff:
Antuan Patterson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Patterson, Christopher v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Christopher Patterson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
PATTERSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv06147
Plaintiff:
STACY PATTERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Patterson v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv06062
Plaintiff:
Ruby J. Patterson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Patterson v. SSA
as 5:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Loreli Patterson
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Michael James Patterson v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv02321
Plaintiff:
Michael James Patterson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Alejandro Patterson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 23-13317
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEJANDRO RICARDO PATTERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Patterson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03310
Plaintiff:
Robert Patterson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Patterson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
Kayla M. Patterson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Patterson v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00831
Plaintiff:
Matthew David Patterson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
