Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Shackelford v. Koskinen
as 5:2017cv04928
Plaintiff:
Dan Laws Shackelford
Defendant:
John Koskinen
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Belcik v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv00808
Plaintiff:
Joseph A Belcik
Defendant:
United States of America, John Randall Clark, Dan Itchue and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
United States of America v. Oostema et al
as 5:2017cv00532
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dean M Oostema , Talieh D Oostema , Bernadette Rouhani and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. KAS Cable TV, Inc., et al
as 3:2015cv00357
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Respondent:
KAS Cable TV, Inc and Dan Kinney
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 287
United States of America v. Olia
as 5:2015cv02151
Respondent:
Dan Olia
Petitioner:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Rotta
as 1:2014mc22167
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dan Rotta
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Dan Patterson v. Government of the Virgin Islan, et al
as 14-1621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAN E. PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS and VI BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Peters v. Bray et al
as 4:2012cv00582
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Carol Peters
Defendant:
Dan Bray , Lee Ken Walker , Arthur Calvert Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Ai et al v. Chen et al
as 1:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
Fang Lin Ai, Fu Rong An, Fen Xiang Bai and others
Petitioner:
Ju Cao , Dan Ping Chang , Jin Hai Chen and others
Defendant:
Bo Chen , Hong Chen and Ju Mei Chen
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
United States of America v. Szaflarski et al
as 2:2011cv10275
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dan Szaflarski, Elaine Szaflarski, Szaflarski Partners and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
