Cases 11 - 20 of 33
USA v. Wade et al
as 2:2015cv00883
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Stanley L. Wade, Janet B. Wade, Cherry Hills UBO and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
The State of Ohio et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2015cv00321
Plaintiff:
The State of Ohio , Warren County, Ohio , The Ohio Department of Administrative Services and others
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Health and Human Services and Sylvia Mathews Burwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
WARREN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00068
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
GERARD WARREN
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
United States of America v. Jackson
as 1:2014cv00085
Respondent:
Warren Russell Jackson
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. LEIGHTON
as 2:2013cv03996
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , RUTH JAMES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Defendant:
WARREN R. LEIGHTON
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604 a IRS: Complaint to Enforce IRS Summons
DUGAS v. TURNER et al
as 2:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
ALAN J DUGAS
Defendant:
WARREN TURNER and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
USA v. David Warren
as 11-17934
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID WARREN
St Tammany Parish v. Omni Pinnacle, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv01472
Plaintiff:
St Tammany Parish
Defendant:
Omni Pinnacle, LLC, Shaw Environmental, Inc, Aaron Marsh and others
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Warren Parchan, et al v. USA
as 11-55848
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN PARCHAN and BARBARA PARCHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mayley v. United States of America et al
as 8:2011cv00896
Petitioner:
Randolph Warren Mayley
Respondent:
United States of America, Carolina First and Pavillion Towers LLC
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
