Cases 81 - 90 of 3,620
Panchal et al v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Pina Panchal and South Tampa Cardiology, LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Solis, et al. v. T-Mobile US, Inc., et al.
as 24-2412
Plaintiff:
JANNET SOLIS, MICHAEL ORTEGA, ADVANCED WEIGHT LOSS SURGICAL ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
T-MOBILE US, INC. and UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY
Peralta v. T-Mobile
as 4:2024cv02229
Plaintiff:
Lizbeth Peralta
Defendant:
T-Mobile
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Sepulveda v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Rudy Sepulveda
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Bloosurf, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01047
Plaintiff:
Bloosurf, LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and TDI ACQUISITION SUB, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Esperanza Reyes Rendon v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01666
Plaintiff:
Esperanza Reyes Rendon
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. a Delaware corporation, DOES 1 through 20, inclusive and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Rissi v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Emily Dockham Rissi
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc., NextGen Global Resources, LLC, Kineticom, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 wt Removal- Employment (Wrongful Termination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
