Cases 81 - 90 of 889
DCK NORTH AMERICA, LLC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv01670
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
DCK NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Alvarado Castillo et al v. Shippensburg Urban Developers, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02236
Plaintiff:
Maria Maribel Alvarado and Jose Francisco Alvarado Castillo
Defendant:
United States of America, by Internal Revenue Service and Shippensburg Urban Developers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. BELL et al
as 2:2019cv02437
Defendant:
JENNIFER C. BELL and JAMES A. BELL
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MULLER and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604 a IRS: Complaint to Enforce IRS Summons
GORDON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2019cv00187
Plaintiff:
TODD D. GORDON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TRINITY HOUSING, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv04976
Plaintiff:
TRINITY HOUSING, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
SHIPPENSBURG URBAN DEVELOPERS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv04775
Plaintiff:
SHIPPENSBURG URBAN DEVELOPERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
United States of America et al v. Haber
as 3:2019mc00521
Plaintiff:
Revenue Officer Cynthia Topoleski and United States of America
Defendant:
John J. Haber
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
CLEMENT et al v. UNITED STATE OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv04658
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANDREW CLEMENT
Defendant:
UNITED STATE OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRISLIN
as 2:2019cv03749
Defendant:
DONALD BRISLIN
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604 a
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GIFFIN et al
as 2:2019cv02906
Defendant:
DEBRA GIFFIN and CARTY GIFFIN
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
