Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Green v. Werfel
as 3:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Clinton Green, Sr.
Defendant:
Daniel I. Werfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Clinton Savings Bank v. Capital One Bank, (USA), N.A. et al
as 4:2022cv40150
Plaintiff:
Clinton Savings Bank
Defendant:
Capital One Bank, (USA), N.A., United States of America, NPA Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
United States of America v. Rainer et al
as 2:2016cv11085
Defendant:
Margaret Rainer, Arrow Financial Services, LLC, LVNV Funding, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
United States of America v. Broomfield
as 3:2015cv01654
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Clinton A Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
United States of America v. Knudson
as 2:2014cv00298
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Clinton Knudson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Green v. Werfel
as 3:2013cv01206
Plaintiff:
Clinton Green, Sr.
Defendant:
Daniel I. Werfel
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7405
Clinton Green, Sr. v. Commissioner of IRS, et al
as 13-12573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLINTON GREEN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF IRS, LINDA STIFF, I.R.S. Executive and RICHARD SPIRES, I.R.S. Executive
Green v. Shulman et al
as 3:2013cv00358
Plaintiff:
Clinton Green, Sr.
Defendant:
Douglas H. Shulman, Linda Stiff and Richard Spires
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6702 IRS: Refund of Income Tax Penalty
Redford v. Obama, et al
as 1:2010cv23403
Plaintiff:
Saphyre Redford and Danielle Biton
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Carnival Cruise Lines, Municipality of Montgomery County, Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Garland
as 4:2010cv00391
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Clinton Garland
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
