Other Statutes Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 196
Michael Johnson v. David Snow, et al
as 19-17063
Defendant / Appellee: JOSHUA R. MESQITA, Phoenix Gang Unit Detective South Mountain Precinct, JACOB BROWN, BRIAN KAISER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL DYWANE JOHNSON, AKA Michael Dewayne Johnson
Truman v. Orem City, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-4133
Plaintiff / Appellant: CONRAD TRUMAN
Defendant / Appellee: OREM CITY, a Utah municipality, DEPUTY UTAH COUNTY ATTORNEY CRAIG JOHNSON, an individual; OFFICER(S) JOHN/JANE DOE 110, individuals; ATTORNEY(S) JOHN/JANE DOE 1-5, OREM CITY POLICE OFFICER THOMAS WALLACE, an individual and others
The Estate of Lana Keenan v. Hoffman-Rosenfeld
as 19-2730
Defendant / Appellee: The County of Suffolk, Maureen Peterson, The Suffolk County Department of Social Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: The Estate of Lana Keenan, Sara Keenan, Damien Keenan, a minor child and others
Defendant: Child Protective Services of The State of New York and The County of Suffolk, Yet Unidentified Defendants Who Are Not Medical Providers 1-20, Yet Unidentified County, Municipal, and New York State Employees 1-20 and others
Jonathan Elphic v. Franklin County, et al
as 19-2816
Defendant / Appellee: Brent Symens, County Attorney for Franklin County, Iowa, Martin Petersen, Assistant County Attorney for Bulter County, Iowa, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jonathan J. Elphic
Mark Downey v. Mark Herring
as 19-1906
Defendant / Appellee: STEPHEN MACISAAC, Arlington County, Virginia County Attorney, ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK DOWNEY
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF VIRGINIA DOWNEY
Mark Downey v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 19-1895
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK DOWNEY
Defendant / Appellee: ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA, STEPHEN MACISAAC, County Attorney, Arlington County, Virginia, MS. QUINTEROS, Substitute FOIA Official and others
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF VIRGINIA DOWNEY
Mark Downey v. William Barr We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1807
Defendant / Appellee: BELFOR HOLDINGS, INC., STEPHEN ALEXANDER MACISAAC, Arlington County Attorney, BENJAMIN SCRIBNER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK DOWNEY
Hackford v. The State of Utah, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-4093
Defendant / Appellee: GARY HERBERT, in his capacity as Governor of Utah, SEAN D. REYES, in his capacity as Attorney General of Utah, THE STATE OF UTAH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD DOUGLAS HACKFORD
Michael Channel, Sr. v. John Brinker, et al
as 19-16319
Defendant / Appellee: KATHRYN MCCORMICK, Deputy County Attorney, DENISE MICHELLE O'ROURKE, Deputy County Attorney, MICHAEL W. BAKER, Deputy County Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL ALLEN CHANNEL, Sr.
Rudy Stanko v. State of South Dakota, et al
as 19-2302
Defendant: Defendants 1x through 4x, Jailer Brandon Luther, in his individual capacity and Austin Chafin, individually, and in his official capacity as a Hot Springs policeman
Plaintiff / Appellant: Rudy Butch Stanko, individually, and on behalf of similarly situated non Indian residents on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation and border towns
Defendant / Appellee: Jailer Brandon Luther, in his official capacity as a guard at the Fall River County jail, James G. Sword, individually, and as a hired attorney for the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation; as a private attorney with a Hot Spring office; and in his official capacity as an elected Fall River County Attorney in an alien jurisdiction, venue and vic, Carol Foster, individually, and in her official capacity as a self-appointed magistrate to set cash bonds for misdemeanor allegations made by Indians against non-Indians on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in an alien Fall River jurisdiction, venue and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?