Cases 111 - 120 of 190
Herron et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-12935
Plaintiff:
Sandy Herron and Richard Herron
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
D'Alessandro v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv00416
Plaintiff:
Giuseppe D'Alessandro
Defendant:
United States of America, Michael Chertoff, Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. INDIANAPOLIS NEUROSURGICAL GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2006cv01778
Plaintiff:
MELANIE ANDERSON, TOM HERRON, STATE OF INDIANA and others
317) 636-7505 (fax:
Thomas A. John, Thomas A. John, Thomas A. John and others
Defendant:
MARK BRYNIARSKI, M.D., MICHAEL BURT, M.D., PATRICK CONNOLLY, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Almendarez et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2013cv00086
Plaintiff:
Armando Almendarez , Daniel Crosby , Aaron Drecksel and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv01923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Carl Herron
as 12-6558
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARL E. HERRON
Acker et al v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv15144
Petitioner:
Lawrence J Acker , Patrick Simasko , Wayne Stanford and others
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sheldon Herron v. US Attorney General
as 12-15280
Petitioner:
SHELDON HERRON, a.k.a. Sheldon Anthony Herron
Respondent:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER et al
as 2:2012cv08759
Defendant:
1ST CENTURY BANCSHARES, INC., 1ST CENTURY BANK, MICHAEL BRUCE ABELSON and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel David Dydzak
USA v. John Herron
as 12-3198
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN HERRON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
