Cases 111 - 118 of 118
ITP, INC. v. OCI COMPANY, LTD. et al
as 2:2011cv00458
Plaintiff:
ITP, INC.
Defendant:
OCI COMPANY, LTD., OCI INTERNATIONAL, INC. , UNIVAR USA, INC. and others
A.B. et al v. STAROPOLI et al
as 2:2010cv02487
Plaintiff:
A.B. and L.B.
Defendant:
MARK STAROPOLI, PAULA STAROPOLI, CLARKSTOWN SOCCER CLUB and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Mandarino v. Mandarino
as 10-1469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Patrician Mandarino, as Personal Representative of the Estate of James J. Mandarino, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
James Mandarino, Alexandria Paolercio and John Does 1 through 5
Chapman v. New York State Division for Yo
as 10-967
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bruce Chapman
Defendant:
New York State Division for Youth, New York State Department of Social Services, John Johnson and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Office of Children and Family Services of the State of New York, Cornell University, New York State College of Human Ecology at Cornell University and others
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Fleming et al
as 1:2009cv00064
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, Inc.
Defendant:
Dennis Fleming, Dwayne Fleming, Marsha Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332 Telecommunications Act of 1996
AIS Ventures, LLC et al v. Xirinachs et al
as 2:2008cv03622
Plaintiff:
AIS Ventures, LLC and Andrew Smoler
Defendant:
Michael J. Xirinachs, John Livecchi, Robert Rocco and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MOTOSTRADA, LLC v. HITRINOV et al
as 2:2008cv03648
Plaintiff:
MOTOSTRADA, LLC
Defendant:
MICHAEL HITRINOV, EMPIRE UNITED LINES CO., INC., CORPORATE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Heinemann et al v. Kennedy et al
as 2:2007cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jerome E. Heinemann, Nelson "Skip" Foley, Jr., Jeanne Doogs and others
Defendant:
Beverly Kennedy, D. Andrew Byrne, Jackson W. Maynard, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
