Cases 131 - 140 of 171
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: Henry Stubbs, III
as 12-3286
Petitioner:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Respondent:
MICHAEL CURLEY, Warden at MCF and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Nominal Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jim Brown v. Brett Brewer, et al
as 12-55739
Plaintiff:
JIM BROWN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRAD GREENSPAN
Objector:
TRAFELET & COMPANY, LLC and RICHARD A. BORDOW
Claimant:
STUBBS ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP
Defendant - Appellee:
BRETT C. BREWER, DANIEL L. MOSHER, LAWRENCE MOREAU and others
Movant:
JOHN FRIEDMANN and PATTY PIERCE
Third-party-defendant:
VANTAGEPOINT VENTURE
Communication Access Center for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Inc. v. McKittrick et al
as 2:2011cv15181
Plaintiff:
Communication Access Center for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Inc. and Thomas Dafnos
Defendant:
Diana McKittrick, Maxine Lakosky, Kellie Liscum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Tanya Johnson v. William Zimmer
as 11-2034
Debtor - Appellant:
TANYA RENE JOHNSON, f/k/a Tanya Rene Zimmer
Respondent:
WILLIAM H. ZIMMER
Trustee - Appellee:
TRAWICK HAMILTON STUBBS, JR.
Stubbs v. Velocity Investments, LLC
as 9:2011cv80979
Plaintiff:
Tracy T. Stubbs
Defendant:
Velocity Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stubbs v. EOS CCA
as 2:2011cv00433
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Stubbs
Defendant:
EOS CCA and Qwest Communications
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
